Demand the resignation of President Al Assad evaporation

Deputy Prime Syrian government Kadri nice to "demand resignation of President Bashar al-Assad, is unrealistic, evaporated in Western countries and the opposition militant
also after Sure that the balance of power does not allow them to impose conditions posed only victor absolute proved the Syrian army that strong army despite the fact that armed groups backed forces have extensions large and deep, "adding that" this requirement was not innocent and was intended to break up the meat of the Syrian army and the abolition of his final role, the fact that the President is the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. "
He stressed beautiful in an interview for "Al-Manar", that "the dispute is essential is about the future of Syria from two to democracy first sectarian Sevit Syria (Iraq-style or Lebanese) and the second democratic political and unite Syria," pointing out that "the violence and dialogue go with two parallel but opposite and we will see from now onwards in constant opposition to roll towards dialogue and rejects dialogue will come out of political life for good. "
He added that "dialogue in Syria was the need since the beginning of the crisis, and now it has become possible is as irreversible, it is driving the dialogue today is the objective reality and intractability faced planned U.S. - Zionist because there Syrian army and internal balances political in the country."
He pointed out that "regional parties will come to the dialogue and waiting for their turn to join the list of supporters", and expressed his belief that the "great teacher (USA) distributes roles in order to exert pressure on the other party."
And Carter, "I can not believe that Qatar or Turkey, have an independent position for the U.S. position."
Jamil commented on the Israeli raid on Damascus, saying that "the Israeli enemy takes advantage of the continued fighting and bleeding in Syria, in addition to the fact that the general trend of acceptance to the principle of dialogue is not consistent with his plans." He believed that "the liberation of the occupied territories and how this liberalization will be one of the points the garrison at the dialogue table A party who has dealt with abroad and Arthn him will be difficult for him to accept a portion of the higher principles that will be agreed upon and if accepted Vsaqublha forced."
Share on Google Plus

0 Comments:

Post a Comment