Passed the reign of the late President Anwar Sadat under stress, and comes correction revolution at the head of those periods when Sadat found himself surrounded by a pack of men of the late President Gamal Abdel Nasser, who called them the name of the centers of power, and most notably: the Sabry, Vice President of the Republic, and Shaarawy Gomaa Minister Interior, Mohamed Fayek, Minister of Information, and Mohamed Labib Choucair Speaker of Parliament, and Sami Sharaf, secretary of the President.
Recordings outbreak of the crisis
The beginning was in the evening of May 11, 1971, when a police officer works in the control of the phone management in the Ministry of Interior of the home of President attended, and gave him a set of records, including the bar holds a call between the two power centers plotting Sadat and plotting to assassinate him.
Mass resignations
Sadat sacked Interior Minister Shaarawy Gomaa, power centers responded surprise President Bastqalat collectively, in order to bring about a constitutional vacuum, but response to President Sadat came quickly, and form on May 14, 1971, the first year the Ministry devoid of the centers of power since July 1952 revolution.
Reaction shocking pillowcases
On the evening of May 15, 1971m citizens were surprised by the news of the resignation of five of the most important Cabinet Radio, headed by minister: military, interior and media, in the evening news, and after less than 48 hours gave Sadat important speech in which he announced the arrest of fired them power centers, and lists the plot details he suffered, and the resigned ministers try to make a political vacuum in the country, and their associates do spying him to embarrass him and insulting him, and were arrested inside the radio and television building, and hired Sadat Balthagat has led the Republican Guard commander Leithy Nassef.
Trial centers of power
Held a special tribunal to try members of the centers of power charges of attempting to overthrow the government and sentenced to death against each other, but President Sadat commuted to imprisonment for varying periods, and some of them stayed the full term behind bars, and others were released for health reasons.
Bread Uprising
Erupted in protest demonstrations on 18 and 19 January 1977, called the bread riots, in several Egyptian cities against the removal of subsidies on a range of commodities, and that after the announcement of Dr. Abdel Moneim El-Kaissouni Deputy Prime Minister and Finance and Economic Affairs, on January 17, 1977 AD, in a statement him in front of the People's Assembly a set of economic decisions, notably the removal of subsidies for a range of commodities and thus raise the price of bread, sugar, tea, rice, oil, and gasoline, as well as 25 other commodity vital commodities in the life of the ordinary citizen, then went national newspapers Pmanhitat talk about the communist plot to overthrow the government and bring about confusion in Egypt in Jan. 19, and announced in the second half bulletin news for the abolition of economic decisions, and declared a state of emergency and a curfew from 18:00 until 6:00.
Arrests in September
Sept. 3 in 1981 began a campaign of mass arrests ordered by the late President Anwar Sadat against opposition figures to the Camp David Accords, and that was the straw that broke the camel's back, was 1536 and senior writers, journalists, clerics and political opposition figures arrested. On September 5th stop of the late President Anwar Sadat in Parliament and made ​​a statement to the nation named after the b farewell speech, because it was the last speech of President Sadat before his departure on October 6 of the same year shot by officers of the armed forces affiliated with the Islamic group.
Oct. 22, as Jerusalemites were watching reports about the terror rampage in Ottawa, a private car was barreling down toward the light railway station near Ammunition Hill in the Israeli capital.
 The train pulled up at the station and passengers got off. The car, driven by Abdel Rahman al-Shaludi, 21, from the Silwan neighborhood of East Jerusalem, managed to cross the tracks, dodge the bollards and run over some of the passengers who had just gotten off the train.
Among those run over were Chana and Shmuel Braun, who were carrying their 3-month-old baby girl, Chaya Zissel Braun. Shaludi continued his murderous rampage hitting several other passengers until he slammed the car into a post. 
He tried opening the door, but it jammed. He then crawled out of the window and attempted to escape. He was shot by two policemen and later died of his wounds.
The baby girl, who came into the world after a series of grueling fertility treatments, later died at the hospital, where seven other casualties were hospitalized, including her mother. Shaludi was a Hamas militant living in a contentious neighborhood in East Jerusalem. Dozens of Jewish families, who (legally) purchased various properties in this densely populated Palestinian neighborhood, have moved in since the end of September. Having taken place in the afternoon of Oct. 22, this incident set a new record in what is now termed the “silent intifada” or “urban intifada” that has been raging in East Jerusalem in recent months. It makes a laughingstock of the efforts by the Jerusalem police to curb it.
On Oct. 23, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman posted the following on his Facebook account: “The terror attacks that took place almost simultaneously yesterday in two different parts of the world — Jerusalem and Ottawa — prove once again that terror is a global epidemic which must be fought against unrelentingly and forcefully. Terrorism,” Liberman continued, “does not stem from construction in Jerusalem, Ottawa, New York, Madrid, London or Mombasa; rather, it stems from the struggle of radical Islam against the Western world.”
Liberman is both right and wrong at the same time. He is right in terms of defining the Islamic terror raging in many parts across the world as a struggle between civilizations, to which Israel is not directly linked. It is neither linked to the rise of the Islamic State or al-Qaeda’s rampage, nor to the Salafist terror in Sinai or other manifestations of Islamic terror around the globe. On the other hand, Liberman is wrong to ignore the auspicious circumstances that Israel has created in East Jerusalem, which fan the fire of extremism and provide oxygen to the constantly burning embers of terror in the world’s most volatile place, to wit, the Temple Mount and East Jerusalem. Liberman knows full well that under any other circumstances — whereby the Israeli government in Jerusalem would have held earnest negotiations with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, or alternatively would have introduced a genuine and bold peace plan before the whole world or at least recognized the Saudi Initiative as a basis for negotiations — it would have been possible to pacify the Palestinian population in the Israeli capital. But there is no such government in Jerusalem. What the city has right now is an intifada — silent or urban. Whatever its name, it is certainly alive and kicking.
There are some 350,000 Palestinians living in East Jerusalem. Their status is different from the rest of the Palestinians living in the West Bank or Gaza Strip. The Palestinians in Jerusalem are bearers of the standard blue Israeli ID card. Although they have the right to vote, they do not enjoy full-fledged citizenship. They profit from the generous benefits of Israel’s social welfare and health care systems, as well as other benefits that their fellow Palestinians from the territories do not have. Yet they feel like second-class citizens. They look around them and see the neglect in their neighborhoods and the rundown infrastructure. At the same time, they also see the ongoing expansion of Jewish settlement in Jerusalem, so they feel disgruntled. The daily riots on Temple Mount, a hub and a magnet to all Palestinian extremists, do not help cool down the atmosphere.
Right now, the situation in Jerusalem is extremely volatile and sensitive. As noted here quite a few times before, the ultimate evil — should it occur — will start here. Radicals from all sides are drawn to Jerusalem like a moth to a flame. On one side of the barricade are radical Jewish movements sanctifying the ascent of Jews for prayers on Temple Mount. On the other side of the barricade are radical Islamists who view the Temple Mount as the Muslim world’s “Holy of Holies” and they would not stand to see Jews in that area. Neither side is really in the right. Everyone sees the issue through their own subjective prism. Each side is yearning for a mega explosion and a massive fireball that they believe will hasten the “Day of Judgment.” The Muslims believe that on that day God and his prophet Muhammad will scatter the Jews all over and put an end to the Zionist enterprise. Jews, on the other hand, believe that the Messiah will finally arrive and Muslims will be thrown into history’s dumpster. It’s a pity that only the radicals in these volatile places get to speak up, while the silent majority on both sides looks at them helplessly.
The light rail in Jerusalem, Mayor Nir Barkat’s flagship project, is seen by the Muslim rioters as the “symbol of Israeli rule” in the city. Designed to pass also through the Arab neighborhoods, it aimed to provide modern transportation services to Arabs from East Jerusalem. For some reason, however, they do not play along. For the past several months, the light rail has been the target of vandalism. Its cars have become a moving target, pelted with stones on a daily basis. The damage that’s been caused to the train and the city is staggering. While it is an expression of Palestinian thanklessness on one hand, it also serves as an arena for cultural, political, religious and diplomatic kerfuffle on the other.
Calls have been made in Israel to quickly and harshly suppress this new intifada, no holds barred. Although this demand is justified, its execution, however, is perilous. The situation is a powder keg just waiting to explode all around us at any moment. And when it does, we will all look wistfully at the “silent intifada.” For the gates of hell to open, all it takes is one unexpected incident on the Temple Mount that will spiral out of control, resulting in a few Palestinian fatalities. Israel understands that perfectly. Abbas, on the other hand, is slightly less apprehensive. In a pugnacious speech he delivered Oct. 17, in which he used harsh and unprecedented terms (as far as he is concerned) to describe Israel and its policy, he called on the Palestinians to rally in the defense of the Temple Mount. Abbas, too, is treading a very fine line here, poking the tiger. The last time this tiger was provoked and went wild, the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat tried riding on its back. We all know how that ended. So does Abbas. No one wants to go back to that ending. If things continue to unfold at the same rate as they do now, this ending will backlash at us, on its own initiative.
Announced the ruling National Congress Party in Sudan with an Islamic background Tuesday that he did not extend an invitation to the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist to attend the general conference which will be held in Khartoum from 23 to 25 this month.
The vice president of the National Congress Party, Ibrahim Ghandour, in a press statement, "did not we invite to the group in Egypt," in reference to the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist.
Ghandour added, "We make the call for the parties and was supposed to call on the Freedom and Justice Party, but that is impossible as a result of the circumstances of the party," in reference to the decision banned in Egypt and imprisoned a large number of its leaders for committing crimes of violence and terrorism.
Media reports have accused the Sudanese government of Egyptian Islamic background supporting the terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt support for deposed President Mohamed Morsi.
However, the authorities in Khartoum denies to be provided any support for the Muslim Brotherhood or the Freedom and Justice Party in Egypt emanating from them.
Ghandour explained that the ruling party face invitations to "representatives from 48 countries to attend a conference of his party, including Iran," adding that Tehran had "confirmed their participation but did not name its representative" after.
The presidency announced last week that Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir will visit Cairo in the eighteenth and nineteenth of this month.
This will be his first visit after the inauguration of the Egyptian president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi the reins of power to a successor Mursi.

Unordered List

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Archive

Total Pageviews

Popular Posts

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner