.jpg)
The newspaper said in a report on Monday that killed James Foley video might just be the representative, the killing occurred while the real behind the camera, after a stop filming.
It pointed out that the analysis of the video clip indicates that the British jihadist who appeared in the film might just be the "interface", but it is not the real killer.
The analytical study of the clip, which does not exceed the duration of 40 seconds, carried out by an international company specializing in forensics, working for the institutions of the British police, to undergo video to deceive the operations and adjustments.
The Times newspaper quoted a forensic analysts as saying that he can not see the traces of blood, despite the fact that I passed the knife to the neck of the journalist at least six times.
As mentioned analysis is based on the sounds that issued from Foley during the video does not appear to be consistent with the expected of a person exposed to the slaughter, as shown by an audio letter short break during an interview with the press, suggesting that the journalist had to repeat the line.
It quoted one of the experts, who examined the video saying: "I think that the real murder may have occurred after the cessation of the camera."
However, the company said, who asked not to be named, she can not say for sure exactly healthy those doubts.
The British newspaper The Times quoted a senior source in the British government as saying that the suspect was the murder of American journalist is a British national of Egyptian origin Abdul Majeed Abdul Bari, and knows this young man aged 23 years between the fundamentalist "Islamic state" as "jihadist Johnny", he had been living since in a house worth 1 million pounds Astralini west London.
The Bari had published his account on the network via "Twitter" a short time ago a picture carries the severed head.
.jpg)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment